The Ten Commandments:
Ethics for the Twenty-First Century by Mark F. Rooker, Nashville: Broadman
& Holman, 2010
With careful exegesis and detailed scholarship, this work
makes a significant contribution to the study of the Ten Commandments from a
conservative evangelical perspective. It is written in such a way that it will
be beneficial to interested laymen, Sunday School teachers, pastors,
theologians, and scholars. The introduction thoughtfully considers the issues
of the conflict over the numbering of the commandments among Jewish, Roman
Catholic and Protestant scholars. Likewise, the conclusion offers significant
help to the Bible student seeking to apply these moral laws to contemporary
life and forming a biblically ethical framework that is pleasing to God. The
chapters between the introduction and conclusion deal with each of the Ten
Commandments in numerical order one chapter at a time. The separate Hebrew terminology
used for each commandment in both the Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5 passages are
carefully exegeted, compared and contrasted. Thus, this work has an advantage
over most commentaries on either Exodus or Deuteronomy since the majority of
scholars give very little space to the difference in wording in these two texts.
This makes this volume extremely useful
in studying this subject.
Biblical Theology
Rooker’s format of each chapter on each of the Ten
Commandments is extremely helpful to the student of Biblical Theology.
Following each chapter’s introduction, he then addresses the meaning of the commandment
at hand. In this section he sets the context in the Ancient Near East and
carefully defines the important Hebrew terms in each commandment from Exodus
and Deuteronomy. The next section deals with the commandment being studied as
it appears in the Old Testament followed by a section on its occurrences in the
New Testament. Each chapter’s conclusion gives further explanation and
summarizes the chronological study already offered and then adds practical
applications and suggestions for modern life.
Handling the
Controversial Fourth Commandment
Because of the wide range of opinions on the fourth
commandment, it is impossible for an evangelical Christian to take a position
that is accepted by all Bible students. Dr. Rooker does not shy away from this
commandment or refuse to take a position. Even though it differs at its onset
from this reviewer’s published view, after careful study of this chapter, this
reviewer believes Rooker’s position is the most defensible one. Along with many
evangelicals, Rooker states that the fourth commandment is not repeated in the
New Testament in the sense that it is binding upon New Covenant believers. No
one would argue that it is not mentioned in the Sabbath debates between the
Pharisees and Jesus. But the other nine commandments that appear in teaching
passages for Jewish and Gentile Christians are directly applied to them as
ethical behavior that is pleasing to God because they reveals his character (e.g.
Rom 7:7, 13:8-10; 1 Cor 7:19, 10:14; Eph 6:1-2; 1 Thes 4:2-3; 1 John 5:21).
Thus, even though this reviewer has argued that the first nine commandments are
repeated in 1 Tim 1:8-11 and applied to new covenant believers, there is a
weakness in this view that is not present in Dr. Rooker’s position on this
issue. His viewpoint best supports the perspicuity (clarity) of Scripture. This
doctrine is under attack by certain Emerging Church spokesmen even though it is
directly taught in passages like Psa 19:8. “The command [mitzvah] of the LORD [Yahweh] is radiant, [BDB =pure, clear] making
the eyes light up” (Psa 19:8 HCSB). The Ten Commandments are most assuredly included in
the moral commands (mitzvah) that the
Bible declares are “clear.” Without significant outside help, most believers in
various cultures studying 1 Tim 1:8-11 would not see that these adjectives all
apply to the first nine commandments in order starting with the third adjective.
Thus, Dr. Rooker’s view that the fourth commandment is not repeated in the New
Testament is what most readers would also see in their reading of it and thus
his stance supports the doctrine of the clarity of the Scriptures better than
the viewpoint of this reviewer.
Likewise, Rooker
also denies that there is sufficient biblical evidence that Sunday replaced
Saturday in the Messiah’s administration of the New Covenant as the Christian
Sabbath. Reformed Baptists and conservative Presbyterians will not agree with
this view whereas most types of Dispensationalists will make this same
argument. This view is also the easiest one to defend from the Bible text
itself without going into complicated typology and continuity issues. However,
Rooker’s application of the moral principles behind the fourth commandment is
identical to this reviewer’s view and will be accepted with joy by those who don’t
have antinomian tendencies.
Significant Insights
In chapter ten of this work, the explanation on coveting may
be one of the best in print in English. It is very insightful to make the distinction
that what is forbidden in this commandment is longing for an actual possession
that belongs to a specific person or a person legally attached to him/her
rather than desiring a possession similar to one owned by a friend. A balance
between the positions of the legalists and the libertines is found in each
chapter of this work, but this is clearly evident in chapter ten.
Possible Improvements
Because of the subtitle, this reviewer would recommend the
addition of a footnote on abortion in chapter five. At what point the baby
should be considered a person needs to be stated. Thus, he/she would be protected
by this law against murder. Simply citing a work on the Old Testament that defends
human life and personhood beginning at conception would greatly improve this
chapter. Even though, euthanasia is not mentioned in this chapter either, the
clarity of the meaning of murder in this chapter makes its application to euthanasia
extremely clear.
Conclusion
Like the other works in the NAC Studies in Bible and
Theology, this work by Mark Rooker should be included in the library of every
student of the Bible who teaches other believers biblical truth. Laymen will
not need to spend much time in the footnotes, but they will definitely benefit
from each chapter of this very helpful work.
Ted D. Manby, Th.M.; Goldsboro, NC; Associate Pastor of
Adamsville Baptist Church
No comments:
Post a Comment